CONGRESSIONAL & POTUS TASK TO HOLD ACCOUNTABLE GOP STATE INSURRECTIONISTS FOR VOTING RIGHTS PLUNDERINIG LAWS & ELECTOR BIASING THAT VIOLATED CONSTITUTION 14TH & 15TH AMENDMENTS

By Giacomo B Fischiatore

SUMMARY OF 10/18/2021 TWEET BY COMMONGOODUNITED.COM (@JamesLamancusa)

INTRODUCTION TO 8-PART TWEET: Discussed herein are the clear and apparent 14^th Amendment, Section 3 Constitutional violations that have occurred and are ongoing in GOP states by public officials of those states acting as INSURRECTIONISTS to the United States government by passing Voting Rights Plundering laws in violation of 14^th and 15^th Amendment of the Constitution (equal protection of laws, and equal & fair voting rights for all US citizens, regardless of sex, race etc).

Democrats in Congress have huge Constitutional power regarding dealing with GOP state Insurrectionists (state public officials) who are passing Constitutionally/federally unlawful Voting Rights Plundering laws and instituting other such measures to bias assigned members of the Electoral College in those GOP controlled states. In this same regard, for the same reason, Commander in Chief President Biden has even greater Constitutional power to address these unlawful acts being committed by these state public officials because he has the full backing of the US Military who could be called upon to administer the federal elections in 2022 (& 2024 if problem persists). 1/8

The 1868 14^th  Amendment states that: “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge privileges or immunities of citizens of US; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person in its jurisdiction equal protection of laws” 2/8

Specifically, the 14^th Amendment in Section 3 outlaws and bans insurrectionists of any kind in government (state & its local divisions, or federal) and mandates their removal. In Section 3 it states that no person, government representative/public official or STATE, sworn to Constitution…”shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.” 3/8

Section 3 further states: “..But Congress may by vote of two thirds of each House, remove such disability.” So therefore, Section 3 requires evidence of participation in insurrectionist activity, and that evidence raises a presumption for removal that can only be defeated by a two thirds vote in both chambers. 4/5

If Democrats in Congress fail to address these blatant Constitutional violations being committed by state officials against the U.S. Government, they will be blatantly violating their oath/rule of law. GOP states are violating the substance of the 15^th Amendment which states: ”Right of citizens of US to vote shall not be denied or abridged by US or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” The original 15^th Amendment was amended in 1920 and 1971 by the 19^th and 26^th Amendments, that subsequently added women’s right to vote and lowered the voting age to 18 years of age, respectively. 5/6

Additionally, Section 3 of the 14^th Amendment explicitly mentions Military and President, so both of these branches of federal government are bound to remove whoever has engaged in Insurrectionist activity. Democrats have power to remove insurrectionists in the states. This 1868 obscure provision of the Constitution has never been needed, BUT IT IS NEEDED NOW! 6/8

Plainly put, GOP state Voting Rights Plundering laws are Insurrectionist activity. Post Civil War, priority was given to removing Insurrectionists from all government to avoid a repeat of the Civil War’s devastation, so Section 3 has nation-wide jurisdiction – i.e., Democrats have power and obligation by their Constitutional duties to remove Insurrectionists in states. 7/8

Democrats in Congress need only achieve a majority vote in both legislative chambers for the removal of GOP state Insurrectionists; however, if senators Manchin and Sinema continue as Republican operatives and do not vote against the Insurrectionists, it will then come down to Commander in Chief President Biden to complete his Constitutional duty of issuing and Emergency Executive Order to have the executive branch take over administration of the of the 2022 federal elections as implemented by the Armed Forces (US Military) under the President’s command as so ordered in the violating GOP states. 8/8

BACKGROUND:

Congressional Democrats seem to be ignoring the power bestowed upon them by this portion of Constitution, which allows them to remove insurrectionists by a simple majority, which can only be overruled by a super majority (two-thirds) vote in both chambers (House & Senate). It sounds pretty simple on paper right? But how do you remove public officials from their positions occupied in the GOP states? That doesn’t sound achievable, but it certainly would send those states and individuals a message about violating the Constitution of the Union of states they supposedly belong to? However, the state GOP officials, would in fact, have to step aside and allow the US Military under CiC Biden’s command administer the federal elections in their states until they remove their Voting Rights Plundering laws and Electoral College biasing. GOP-RNC we presume does not stand for Greedy Oligarchic (e.g., Russian-like) Proponents – Republican New Confederates DOES IT?

Democrats should therefore be modeling this process by removing insurrectionists from government as Section 3 requires and Republicans’ only recourse is to achieve a two-thirds vote to override the Congressional action against these state insurrectionists.

This may be that rare moment in history, when principled white men stepped forward and used their elected representative power to restrain other white men. Their predecessors in the post Civil War era had just been through a brutal, bloody, war, which instilled in them a strong desire to adequately modify the Constitution in a manner that would hopefully prevent the recurrence of another civil war. They KNEW how white male insurrectionists needed to be handled, and wrote Section 3 of the 14^th Amendment accordingly.

There has always been questions on why the Section 3 was written the way it was. First, the disinclination of white men to hold other white men accountable was demonstrated elsewhere throughout history in different jurisdictions. Although not a government per se (Vatican City & Church under the Pope & Cardinals), the Roman Catholic Church is a prime example, whereby as priests in great numbers readily broke their vows to the Catholic Church (and God), their superiors in the church VIOLATED THEIR OATH, and turned their heads the other way and ignored the problem for centuries instead of addressing it head on and removing these men from the priesthood. The white men who enacted Section 3 knew it would apply the same way to white men in general.

Fast forward to 2021 present day, and this current crop of white men in US Congress (& in White House) is a century plus removed from this brutal bloody war that occurred in the 1800s, and they cannot reconcile themselves to the “drastic” measures of Section 3, or the uproar it likely will cause when action is taken insurrectionist public officials– as with the priests, they prefer to violate their Oath and rule of law instead, but hopefully the Democratic lawmakers (& POTUS) will rise to the occasion and set things right.

We’re at a make or break point in the history of the U.S. democratic republic, and it is not a time to repeat past mistakes by merely acting to once again protect the white male ruling class at the detriment to the rest of the U.S. population. If we repeat that mistake and don’t learn from history, the US just won’t have much of a future.

APPLICABLE PORTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION:

Thirteenth Amendment:

Abolition of Slavery

Passed by Congress January 31, 1865. Ratified December 6, 1865. The 13th Amendment changed a portion of Article IV, Section 2

The Thirteenth Amendment (Amendment XIII) to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. The amendment was passed by Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified by the required 27 of the then 36 states on December 6, 1865, and proclaimed on December 18.

Section 1

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Fourteenth Amendment:

Citizenship Rights, Equal Protection, Apportionment, Civil War Debt

Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868. The 14th Amendment changed a portion of Article I, Section 2. A portion of the 14th Amendment was changed by the 26th Amendment

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 1

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5

The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

Fifteenth Amendment:

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

Section 1

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

Section 2

The Fifteenth Amendment (ratified in 1870) extended voting rights to men of all races. However, this amendment was not enough because African Americans were still denied the right to vote by state constitutions and laws, poll taxes, literacy tests, the “grandfather clause,” and outright intimidation.

Nineteenth Amendment:

Women’s Right to Vote

Passed by Congress June 4, 1919. Ratified August 18, 1920

The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Passed by Congress June 4, 1919, and ratified on August 18, 1920, the 19th amendment guarantees all American women the right to vote. Achieving this milestone required a lengthy and difficult struggle; victory took decades of agitation and protest. Beginning in the mid-19th century, several generations of woman suffrage supporters lectured, wrote, marched, lobbied, and practiced civil disobedience to achieve what many Americans considered a radical change of the Constitution. Few early supporters lived to see final victory in 1920.

Twenty-sixth Amendment:

A portion of the 14th Amendment was changed by the 26th Amendment:

Right to Vote at Age 18

Passed by Congress March 23, 1971. Ratified July 1, 1971. The 26th Amendment changed a portion of the 14th Amendment

Section 1

The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.

Section 2

The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Comments: Under this approach, states may not enact laws with the intent of making it more difficult for younger voters to vote. It is well established that, in addition to lowering the voting age for all elections to 18, the Twenty-Sixth Amendment also prohibits states from imposing special restrictions or residency rules just on voters who are between 18 and 20 years old. For example, shortly after the Amendment was adopted, the California Supreme Court held that election officials may not presume that unmarried people between 18 and 20 live with their parents, but instead must apply the same residency rules that apply to everyone else.